Recent content by WolverinDEV

Well 4/5 still missing :) (And no: There are not that many donations yet to pay this:/)

Yes, they're quite hard to see. Could be improved :)

"Did you try to reproduce yet", that issue already came up a half a year ago, but nobody who I know ever reproduced it, includign myself.

Well not really. Just showing the packet loss will not help in any sense, because we already know that the cause is due to overload :)

I could feel you. Is there any error within the console? Was this issue reproduceable on a fresh server? Do you have a DB for me to reproduce?

Avg packet loss is currently not calculated :)

https://www.sslpoint.com/eu/code-signing/ If you want to sponsor me one :D

Works in 1.4.2-beta3 But I know that this client does not work, but technically its implemented :D

There is a reason why only 1.4.2-2 is the public release. I'm already aware of this issue :)

Urgh well thats ofc a personal. I for my part could ensure that TeaSpeak will never have a style like TS5 (it looks ugly for me :D)

Grr at the second glimse I saw my mistake :D TS uses UDP not TCP. Well nvm. I'm just supprised why the server would block on send. That could also be the cause for sometimes "laggy" voice. Because these packets which failed to write get dropped.

Whats the output of cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem

Yeahr you dont need trace at all in production. Its as you said even a bottleneck. ---- Automatically Merged Double Post ---- Just out of curiosity: Whats your avarage server bandwidth? ---- Automatically Merged Double Post ---- [[FILTEREDIP]:63534/serveradmin1 | 62] Got "dead" client in...

Well not really. It's just a shitload of data to progress where TeaSpeak gets on his limits. Another lag cause could be massive client connections because they're still quite "heavy" to progress, but its already on my task list. I'm also thinking of creating a new branch where I'm aiming to...

Well yesthat was hust an example. In general you'll not need that much parallel execution because there isn't that many todo. As well your processor only supports 8 Threads at the time, so having way more than this just spends time on context switches. So I think that if 10 threads are execuing...