Hello,
I wanted to request support for more api commands, especially for EasyWI.
It's a very nice interface with many possibilities, but it won't work with TeaSpeak. (See here)
I discovered the same behaviour with for example with the almighty Tea*Speak interface from Psychokiller. (Login gives back error message:
Error in login() on line 2306: ErrorID: 520 | Message: invalid loginname or password extra_msg=username or password dose not match)
After changing the API response to the Tea*Speak default in the settings, EasyWI can import existing servers but any changes done to them will be completely ignored by TeaSpeak (speaking Restarts, changing settings, etc.)
I think it would help TeaSpeak a lot, if it was able to provide a wider variety of features like the "original Tea*Speak" in order to be able to maintain it more easily without the dependency of another additional paid third party application. Wasn't TeaSpeaks slogan something like "Because a license fee is not my cup of tea!"? Why paying additional licensing fees to Tea*Speak-interface.de then? I don't see, where the costs saved are adding up here.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this is something to improve quickly, I know some people myself, that refuse to use TeaSpeak beacause of this limitations and switched over to Tea*Speak licenses instead.
I wanted to request support for more api commands, especially for EasyWI.
It's a very nice interface with many possibilities, but it won't work with TeaSpeak. (See here)
I discovered the same behaviour with for example with the almighty Tea*Speak interface from Psychokiller. (Login gives back error message:
Error in login() on line 2306: ErrorID: 520 | Message: invalid loginname or password extra_msg=username or password dose not match)
After changing the API response to the Tea*Speak default in the settings, EasyWI can import existing servers but any changes done to them will be completely ignored by TeaSpeak (speaking Restarts, changing settings, etc.)
I think it would help TeaSpeak a lot, if it was able to provide a wider variety of features like the "original Tea*Speak" in order to be able to maintain it more easily without the dependency of another additional paid third party application. Wasn't TeaSpeaks slogan something like "Because a license fee is not my cup of tea!"? Why paying additional licensing fees to Tea*Speak-interface.de then? I don't see, where the costs saved are adding up here.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this is something to improve quickly, I know some people myself, that refuse to use TeaSpeak beacause of this limitations and switched over to Tea*Speak licenses instead.
Last edited:
