No, i have some problem.The CPU value itself was normal, 2-3 %. Maybe the problem was reading-writing the HDD of my VDS
extension settings should not be reset?Hmm property the cause of the full sync mode which has been changed with the last build to prevent data loss. Actually this is just a relative graph. How much cpu load does it costs at all?
What kind of problem?No, i have some problem.
On 1.2.31-beta-0, I did not notice this.hmm :/ And the beta 0 was okey for you?
What for? we are going to stability. Better to be safe data storageHmm okey, well its probely the sqlite full sync think.
I think I'll make that configurable and let the user decide:
1) More performance (May data loss on crash)
2) Less performance (Secure data storage even on crash, or power failure)
Yes, while it works better than previous versions1.2.31 beta-2 good? No crash???
No bugs?
?????
That is, you want to say that in the near future server changes should not wait?Well actually I think this is caused by the "big" packets with are roundabout 400 bytes per packet which cause this behavior.
May I cache these allocated buffers and reuse them. I'll see, thirst I'm currently working on the web client and the native client.